BACKAMOTO
CASINO

Yes, and that is the entire reason this site exists. Bitcoin scripts can carry covenants: rules that constrain where the coins are allowed to move next. Put the state in an OP_RETURN, put the rules in the script, and you can express things people spent a decade insisting Bitcoin could not do. Universal already settles real AMM swaps this way, with a constant product pool and a protocol fee, on L1, today. No bridge, no sidechain, no committee.

Because a casino is the least forgiving thing you can build. It has to take custody of nothing, prove its own fairness, and pay out without anyone's permission. If that works on L1, the boring stuff works too. Also because it is funny, and we are not going to pretend otherwise.

Everywhere else it has already been done a thousand times and it means nothing. The only interesting words in this whole project are "on Bitcoin L1". Take those away and you have a slot machine with a jester on it.

He says no. The New York Times said yes in April 2026 after running his old mailing-list posts through a stylometric analysis, and he denied it that same week: "i'm not satoshi", while admitting he's "a reasonable suspect" and that "it's surprisingly hard to prove a negative". We take him at his word. We also named a casino BACKAMOTO. Both things can be true.

No, and you should be suspicious of anything that claims otherwise. Not affiliated, not endorsed, not sponsored, not connected, not aware. There is no official Adam Back coin, and given he is on record calling memecoins worthless, there is unlikely ever to be one. This is a parody casino made by people who like proof-of-work. If he ever asks us to stop, we stop that same day.

What we will claim, because it is checkable: several Adam Back tokens already exist on Solana, all of them dust, at least one with its liquidity pulled. This is the only one that settles on Bitcoin L1, which is the entire point of building it.

The mint is open now. The tables are not: the pool gets seeded first, then they open one at a time. So the only thing that costs you anything today is a mint you sign yourself, and it costs 4,777 sats per mint on top of the Bitcoin network fee. We'd rather say that loudly than quietly.

Because we commit to the outcome before you bet, the randomness comes out of the Bitcoin block, which we very much do not control, and the payout is written into the spending conditions rather than into our terms of service. Every round can be replayed from public data. If our published result doesn't match what you compute, we're caught instantly and publicly. The goal is a house that cannot cheat, not a house that promises it won't.

Other people, always. Every table on this floor is player against player, because there is no bank and we are not building one. A house bankroll is a pot of money someone has to hold, top up, and be trusted not to disappear with, and all three of those are exactly what Bitcoin was built to avoid. So your winnings are somebody else's stake. That means an empty table pays nothing, which is the honest tradeoff: we would rather you wait for an opponent than trust us for a payout.

Two ways, both disclosed up front: a flat fee on every mint, and a small rake off each pot at the tables. Note what is missing from that list: a house edge. We never take the other side of your bet, so we do not profit when you lose. We profit when people play, which is a different incentive and a much healthier one. Zero tokens to the team, no hidden wallet, no unlock schedule.

There's nothing to rug. We hold no tokens, there is no liquidity we control and can pull, no mint function we can call twice, no owner key. Supply is fixed at deploy and the mint is first-come. There is also no bankroll, which cuts both ways honestly: we cannot run off with a treasury, and we cannot fail to pay you out of one either, because your winnings were never ours to hold.

Wen block. 🫡